by Laura Garber
Bark for a Park organizers celebrated in council chambers, some with dogs in tow, after a 3-2 vote Tuesday, May 12 directed city staff to evaluate two potential locations for an off-leash dog park: the east corner of Valley Park and a portion of the Greenbelt between Pier Avenue and 11th Street.
Councilmembers Dean Francois, Rob Saemann and Michael Keegan voted to greenlight feasibility studies for both locations. Mayor Michael Detoy and Councilmember Ray Jackson voted no over concerns about the Valley Park location.
The community-led organization has worked for more than a year promoting, researching and fundraising an off-leash dog park in Hermosa Beach. They gathered over 1,400 signatures, with roughly 60% of those in favor of the Valley Park location.
Other proposed locations included Bi-Centennial Park, Noble Park and a 10,000 square foot section of the beach with limited hours.
The group has raised $80,000 and secured a $250,000 matching grant pending a location decision, and has agreed to fund design, construction and ongoing maintenance.
“We realize the budget is tight for the city, and we want this so badly that we are offering to fund the design phase, the construction phase, and make sure that maintenance has no incremental additional cost to the city,” said Carla Buck, the Chair of Bark for a Park. “We’ve tried to come with solutions, not just complaints.”
The organization’s proposal included monies from public contributions, raffles, redirected revenue from dog licenses and corporate sponsorships to help fund year one and ongoing maintenance of the park.
Bark For a Park estimates initial year one funding between $160,000 and $200,000 and ongoing maintenance between $25,000 and $35,000 annually.
“We worked closely with the Parks and Rec group on the location that we’re recommending at Valley Park East,” Jack Levy, the organization’s Vice Chair said. “Not only are we excited, but we got tremendous support from the community at large.”
But the two locations present varying challenges.
A designer from Gaudet Design Group who visited both sites in January expressed concerns about Valley Park, citing steep slopes and substantial ADA upgrades that would be required throughout the park.
The designer was more optimistic about the Greenbelt location, expressing “confidence that this area would be feasible for a dog park or dog run and identified it as the preferred location among the two sites considered,” the City’s staff report read.
However, a 1989 ordinance mandates dogs be on leash in the Greenbelt. A public vote would be required to amend the ordinance and placed on this November’s ballot.
Some residents in attendance had concerns about the environmental and financial obligations.
Resident Kristin Marino questioned if a dog park on the Greenbelt would affect wildlife.
“Studies have shown that dog waste is harmful to the nutritional content of the soil for native plants, and that a consistent dog presence is detrimental to the migratory, nesting and behavioral patterns of native wildlife,” Marino said.
According to a City report, Manhattan Beach’s dog park costs approximately $84,000 annually to maintain. Bark for a Park’s proposed maintenance budget projects $35,000 per year.
“This leaves Hermosa Beach with a $50,000 a year cost burden,” said Marino, who pointed out the organization’s budget gap. “I don’t know if we can afford to maintain a dog park.”
Roy Robinson, a Valley Drive resident who worked as a construction foreman at the Getty Center, warned the true cost could far exceed the group’s projections.
“I see this project being well in the $2 million to $3 million area,” Robinson said, citing the grading required, the ADA ramp, hedge removal and sidewalk reconstruction along Valley Drive.
Many residents and councilmembers congratulated the organization on its grass-roots push for a dog park.
“What started as just eight individuals has grown into this vibrant volunteer organization,” resident Wendy Finster. said. ER
One Response
Dear ER. First on the question of financing the design, construction and maintenance of the dog park that some have questioned, clearly the city will have to do due diligence and if there are problems with the financing then the deal is most likely off.
But to suggest there is a financing problem before the design has been fleshed-out is premature and in some cases just a disingenuous tactic to derail the project by citizens who simply don’t want a dog park anywhere.
And i believe that is a tactic being used by some who say they support might support the Greenbelt option but say it should be put to a vote. Most people can see that with the 5 or 6 locations that were considered it is going to be very difficult for one location to get 50%+ support.
The vote that may or may not be required because of the passive-use clause in the greenbelt land-grant is being supported by some (not all) as a trojan horse, a poison pill to potentially derail the dog park project.
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Valley Park is a good location with adequate space. The dog park will result in less off leash dogs, less poop stains where young children play, less germs where children play if that is really a problem. It is a good solution far away from homes and as for parking well parking is tough everywhere in hermosa but there is parking that was specifically zoned high turnover surrounding the park.
Finally if the Greenbelt can in fact be approved without a vote as Councilman Saemann suggested then it Im all ears though i personally support the Valley Park solution. But if the business district feels the Greenbelt Solution will generate downtown foot-traffic that is also worth considering.